David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Head-to-Head Stats Comparison

Compare players and teams or see head to head results between teams, players, player vs. team, or batter vs. pitcher. • Tutorial Video • Sample Searches • Data Coverage

THIS QUESTION WAS ANSWERED USING

POWERED BY

Your All Access Pass to the Baseball Database Go beyond the basics. Become a Stathead

Start Your FREE Trial

Show Criteria

Compare Players

Head-to-head stats or multi-player comparisons

Compare Teams

Head-to-head results and comparisons

Player vs. Team

Head-to-head stats for a single player against a team

Today's Probables

Today's starting pitchers vs. opponents

Search Criteria

Seasons

All seasons

Choose season(s) for each choice

Choose same season(s) for all choices

Player 1

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: David Cone

Player 2

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: Mike Williams

Player 3

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 4

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 5

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 6

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Team 1

Team 2

You have edited your search criteria

or keep editing your search

Fetching Results

3.5

468

55

768.1

32-54

144

4.45

97

584

17.4

343

10.2

WAR

G

GS

IP

W-L

SV

ERA

ERA+

SO

K%

BB

BB%

62.3

450

419

2898.2

194-126

1

3.46

121

2668

21.9

1137

9.3

2

Championships

All-Star

Cy Young

5

5

1

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Pitching Comparison

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Totals

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	W	L	W-L%	ERA	G	GS	GF	CG	SHO	SV	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	IBB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	BR	ERA+	FIP	WHIP	H9	HR9	BB9	SO9
1	David Cone	23-40	1986	2003	194	126	.606	3.46	450	419	9	56	22	1	2898.2	2504	1222	1115	258	1137	42	2668	106	32	149	12184	3845	121	3.57	1.256	7.8	0.8	3.5	8.3
2	Mike Williams	23-34	1992	2003	32	54	.372	4.45	468	55	292	1	0	144	768.1	764	416	380	89	343	40	584	20	1	39	3355	1160	97	4.49	1.441	8.9	1.0	4.0	6.8

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	W	L	W-L%	ERA	G	GS	GF	CG	SHO	SV	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	IBB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	BR	ERA+	FIP	WHIP	H9	HR9	BB9	SO9
1	David Cone	25-37	1988	2000	8	3	.727	3.80	21	18	2	1	0	0	111.1	93	52	47	12	58	1	94	2	1	6	480	156		3.35	1.356	7.5	1.0	4.7	7.6
2	Mike Williams	32	2001	2001	0	0		9.00	1	0	1	0	0	0	1.0	3	1	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	6	3		14.05	3.000	27.0	9.0	0.0	9.0

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Value

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Value Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	WAR	WAA
1	David Cone	23-40	1986	2003	450	419	2898.2	61.6	35.5
2	Mike Williams	23-34	1992	2003	468	55	768.1	3.6	-1.9

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Totals Against

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Totals Against Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	BR	AB	1B	2B	3B	SB	CS	SB%	PO	GIDP	SH	SF	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	ISO	BAbip	RC	TB	XBH	TOB	TOBwe
1	David Cone	23-40	1986	2003	450	419	2898.2	3845	10782	1716	466	64	343	134	71.91	19	138	76	82	.232	.309	.359	.669	82	.127	.283	1217	3872	788	3747	3845
2	Mike Williams	23-34	1992	2003	468	55	768.1	1160	2936	498	158	19	83	25	76.85	11	58	33	23	.260	.339	.418	.757	102	.158	.295	425	1227	266	1127	1160

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Totals Against Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	BR	AB	1B	2B	3B	SB	CS	SB%	PO	GIDP	SH	SF	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	ISO	BAbip	RC	TB	XBH	TOB	TOBwe
1	David Cone	25-37	1988	2000	21	18	111.1	156	412	69	8	4	17	4	80.95	0	6	2	2	.226	.323	.352	.675		.126	.263	56	145	24	153	156
2	Mike Williams	32	2001	2001	1	0	1.0	3	6	1	1	0	0	0		0	0	0	0	.500	.500	1.167	1.667		.667	.500	4	7	2	3	3

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Starting & Relieving

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Starting & Relieving Table
					Starting Pitching			Relief Pitching
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	QS	QS%	GmScA	IR	IS	IS%	BSv	SV%	GF	GR
1	David Cone	23-40	1986	2003	257	61	56.8	17	7	41	0	100.0	9	31
2	Mike Williams	23-34	1992	2003	26	47	46.6	163	59	36	25	85.2	292	413

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Starting & Relieving Table
					Starting Pitching			Relief Pitching
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	QS	QS%	GmScA	IR	IS	IS%	BSv	SV%	GF	GR
1	David Cone	25-37	1988	2000	9	50	53.0	0	0		0		2	3
2	Mike Williams	32	2001	2001	0			0	0				1	1

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Ratios

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Ratios Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	K%	BB%	K-BB%
1	David Cone	23-40	1986	2003	450	419	2898.2	21.9	9.3	12.6
2	Mike Williams	23-34	1992	2003	468	55	768.1	17.4	10.2	7.2

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Ratios Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	K%	BB%	K-BB%
1	David Cone	25-37	1988	2000	21	18	111.1	19.6	12.1	7.5
2	Mike Williams	32	2001	2001	1	0	1.0	16.7	0.0	16.7

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Pitch Summary

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Pitch Summary Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	Pit	Pit/GS	Str	Str%
1	David Cone	23-40	1986	2003	450	419	2898.2	5509	110	3307	60.03
2	Mike Williams	23-34	1992	2003	468	55	768.1	4363	87	2616	59.96

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Pitch Summary Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	Pit	Pit/GS	Str	Str%
1	David Cone	25-37	1988	2000	21	18	111.1	1665	102	998	59.94
2	Mike Williams	32	2001	2001	1	0	1.0	15		10	66.67

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Head-to-Head Pitching

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Totals

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Totals Table
Rk	Player	W	L	W-L%	ERA	G	GS	GF	CG	SHO	SV	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	IBB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	WHIP	H9	HR9	BB9	SO9
1	David Cone	1	0	1.000	5.14	1	1	0	0	0	0	7.0	4	5	4	1	4	0	9	1	0	0	31	1.143	5.1	1.3	5.1	11.6
2	Mike Williams	0	0		7.20	1	1	0	0	0	0	5.0	5	4	4	1	2	0	1	0	0	0	21	1.400	9.0	1.8	3.6	1.8

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Game Logs

Subscribe to Stathead Baseball for full results.

Go inside the Baseball Reference database and access the sports search engine that was made for fans like you. Subscriptions start at just $9/month. Learn More.

Get your first month FREE

Already a paid subscriber? Log in for full results.

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Game Logs Table
Rk	Player	Team	Date	App,Dec	IP	H	R	ER	UER	HR	BB	IBB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	BR	AB	1B	2B	3B	SB	CS	PO	TB	GIDP	SH	SF	XBH	GmSc	Pit	Str	WPA	RE24	IR	IS	aLI	DFS(DK)	DFS(FD)
1	David Cone	NYM	1992-07-28	GS-7, W	7.0	4	5	4	1	1	4	0	9	1	0	0	31	9	24	3	0	0	3	0	0	7	0	1	1	1	56	115	65	-0.2	-1.98			0.76
2	Mike Williams	PHI	1992-07-28	GS-5	5.0	5	4	4	0	1	2	0	1	0	0	0	21	7	18	3	1	0	0	0	0	9	1	1	0	2	40	70	41	-0.1	-1.85			0.84

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Batter vs. Pitcher

David Cone (Pitcher) vs. Mike Williams (Batter): Year-by-Year Totals

David Cone (Pitcher) vs. Mike Williams (Batter): Year-by-Year Totals Table
Rk	Year	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	SH	SF	IBB	HBP	GIDP
1	1992	2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	.000	.000	.000	.000	1	0	0	0	0
	Totals	2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	.000	.000	.000	.000	1	0	0	0	0

David Cone (Pitcher) vs. Mike Williams (Batter): Plate Appearances

Subscribe to Stathead Baseball for full results.

Go inside the Baseball Reference database and access the sports search engine that was made for fans like you. Subscriptions start at just $9/month. Learn More.

Get your first month FREE

Already a paid subscriber? Log in for full results.

David Cone (Pitcher) vs. Mike Williams (Batter): Plate Appearances Table
Cr#	Year	Date	B Tm	P Tm		Inn	RoB	Out	Pit(cnt)	Play Description
1	1992	1992-07-28	NYM	PHI	down 4-1	t2	1-3	2	2 (1-0)	Flyball: CF
2	1992	1992-07-28	NYM	PHI	down 5-1	t5	1--	1	2 (0-1)	Bunt Groundout: 1B-2B/Sacrifice (Short 1B Line); T. Hundley to 2B

Mike Williams (Pitcher) vs. David Cone (Batter): Year-by-Year Totals

Mike Williams (Pitcher) vs. David Cone (Batter): Year-by-Year Totals Table
Rk	Year	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	SH	SF	IBB	HBP	GIDP
1	1992	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	.000	.000	.000	.000	0	0	0	0	0
	Totals	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	.000	.000	.000	.000	0	0	0	0	0

Mike Williams (Pitcher) vs. David Cone (Batter): Plate Appearances

Subscribe to Stathead Baseball for full results.

Go inside the Baseball Reference database and access the sports search engine that was made for fans like you. Subscriptions start at just $9/month. Learn More.

Get your first month FREE

Already a paid subscriber? Log in for full results.

Mike Williams (Pitcher) vs. David Cone (Batter): Plate Appearances Table
Cr#	Year	Date	B Tm	P Tm		Inn	RoB	Out	Pit(cnt)	Play Description
1	1992	1992-07-28	PHI	NYM	ahead 1-4	b2	---	1	3 (1-1)	Groundout: 2B-1B (SS-2B)
2	1992	1992-07-28	PHI	NYM	ahead 1-5	b4	---	1	5 (2-2)	Strikeout Looking

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Batting Comparison

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Batting Totals

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Batting Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	David Cone	23-40	1986	2003	193	470	412	28	64	9	0	0	22	0	1	16	91	.155	.192	.177	.369	6	73	8	3	38	1	0
2	Mike Williams	23-34	1992	2003	448	136	108	7	17	2	0	0	7	1	0	3	33	.157	.188	.176	.363	-2	19	1	1	24	0	0

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Batting Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	David Cone	25-37	1988	2000	21	18	16	0	3	0	0	0	1	0	0	1	1	.188	.235	.188	.423	3	2	0	1	0	0

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Batting Value

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Batting Value Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	WAR	WAA	oWAR	dWAR	Rbat	Rdp	Rbaser	Rfield
1	David Cone	23-40	1986	2003	193	470	0.7	0.7	0.6	0.1	-51	1	-1	0
2	Mike Williams	23-34	1992	2003	448	136	-0.2	-0.2	-0.2	-0.2	-20	0	0	0

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Batting Sabermetric

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Batting Sabermetric Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	XBH	TOB	TOBwe	Outs	RC	BAbip	RP	BtRuns	BtWins	ISO	AB/SO	SB%	SBatt
1	David Cone	23-40	1986	2003	193	470	9	83	88	396	15	.199	50	-52	-5.3	.022	4.5	0.0	1
2	Mike Williams	23-34	1992	2003	448	136	2	21	21	116	6	.227	14	-17	-1.7	.019	3.3	100.0	1

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Batting Sabermetric Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	XBH	TOB	TOBwe	Outs	RC	BAbip	RP	BtRuns	BtWins	ISO	AB/SO	SB%	SBatt
1	David Cone	25-37	1988	2000	21	18	0	4	5	16	2	.200	1			.000	16.0		0
2	Mike Williams	32	2001	2001	1	0	0	0	0	0			0						0

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Batting Win Probability

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Batting Win Probability Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	WPA	WPA/LI	Clutch	RE24	REW	RE24/boLI	aLI
1	David Cone	23-40	1986	2003	193	470	-4.5	-5.3	0.3	-46.15	-4.9	-52.89	0.90
2	Mike Williams	23-34	1992	2003	448	136	-1.7	-1.8	0.1	-19.17	-1.8	-20.44	1.03

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Head-to-Head Batting

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Totals

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Totals Table
Rk	Player	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	David Cone	1	3	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	.500	.500	.500	1.000	1	0	0	1	0	0
2	Mike Williams	1	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	.000	.000	.000	.000	0	0	0	0	0	0

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Game Logs

Subscribe to Stathead Baseball for full results.

Go inside the Baseball Reference database and access the sports search engine that was made for fans like you. Subscriptions start at just $9/month. Learn More.

Get your first month FREE

Already a paid subscriber? Log in for full results.

David Cone vs. Mike Williams: Game Logs Table
Rk	Player	Team	Date	GS	InnPl	BOP	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB	aLI	WPA	acLI	cWPA	RE24	DFS(DK)	DFS(FD)	Pos
1	David Cone	NYM	1992-07-28	*	8	9	3	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	.500	.500	.500	1.000	1	0	0	1	0	0	1.18	-0.006	1.48	0.00%	-0.39			P
2	Mike Williams	PHI	1992-07-28	*	6	9	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	.000	.000	.000	.000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.22	-0.011	0.04	0.00%	-0.27			P

Data coverage:

Game data: Game data is only available for the American League, National League, and Federal League. Since 1901 for regular season data, since 1933 for the All-Star Game, and since 1903 for the Postseason.

Season data: Since 1871. Stats relying on play-by-play data are complete back to 1969, nearly complete back to 1950, and mostly complete back to 1912. Postseason data since 1903.

Please see our data coverage page for details.

If you utilize material unique to a Sports Reference site for a tweet, an article, or for research for a broadcast or podcast, please strongly consider citing this site as the source for the material. It would be greatly appreciated and would help us continue to produce this material.