Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Head-to-Head Stats Comparison

Compare players and teams or see head to head results between teams, players, player vs. team, or batter vs. pitcher. • Tutorial Video • Sample Searches • Data Coverage

THIS QUESTION WAS ANSWERED USING

POWERED BY

Your All Access Pass to the Baseball Database Go beyond the basics. Become a Stathead

Start Your FREE Trial

Show Criteria

Compare Players

Head-to-head stats or multi-player comparisons

Compare Teams

Head-to-head results and comparisons

Player vs. Team

Head-to-head stats for a single player against a team

Today's Probables

Today's starting pitchers vs. opponents

Search Criteria

Seasons

All seasons

Choose season(s) for each choice

Choose same season(s) for all choices

Player 1

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: Rick Ankiel

Player 2

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: Brian Stokes

Player 3

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 4

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 5

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 6

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Team 1

Team 2

You have edited your search criteria

or keep editing your search

Fetching Results

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes

Regular Season: 1 PA , 1.000/1.000/1.000, 0 HR, 0 K

Playoffs: 0 PA

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Pitching Comparison

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Totals

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	W	L	W-L%	ERA	G	GS	GF	CG	SHO	SV	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	IBB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	BR	ERA+	FIP	WHIP	H9	HR9	BB9	SO9
1	Rick Ankiel	19-33	1999	2013	13	10	.565	3.90	51	41	1	0	0	1	242.0	198	119	105	32	130	2	269	12	2	20	1039	351	119	4.38	1.355	7.4	1.2	4.8	10.0
2	Brian Stokes	26-30	2006	2010	6	11	.353	5.27	173	5	52	0	0	1	206.2	254	126	121	28	96	12	137	7	0	5	948	362	82	5.08	1.694	11.1	1.2	4.2	6.0

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	W	L	W-L%	ERA	G	GS	GF	CG	SHO	SV	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	IBB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	BR	ERA+	FIP	WHIP	H9	HR9	BB9	SO9
1	Rick Ankiel	20-30	2000	2010	0	0		15.75	3	2	0	0	0	0	4.0	5	7	7	0	11	0	5	0	0	9	26	16		8.88	4.000	11.3	0.0	24.8	11.3

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Value

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Value Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	WAR	WAA
1	Rick Ankiel	19-33	1999	2013	51	41	242.0	3.6	1.7
2	Brian Stokes	26-30	2006	2010	173	5	206.2	0.0	-1.8

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Totals Against

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Totals Against Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	BR	AB	1B	2B	3B	SB	CS	SB%	PO	GIDP	SH	SF	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	ISO	BAbip	RC	TB	XBH	TOB	TOBwe
1	Rick Ankiel	19-33	1999	2013	51	41	242.0	351	876	126	38	2	10	8	55.56	1	18	12	9	.226	.331	.384	.715	85	.158	.284	114	336	72	340	351
2	Brian Stokes	26-30	2006	2010	173	5	206.2	362	826	172	50	4	12	4	75.00	0	27	5	13	.308	.379	.479	.858	130	.172	.335	154	396	82	357	362

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Totals Against Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	BR	AB	1B	2B	3B	SB	CS	SB%	PO	GIDP	SH	SF	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	ISO	BAbip	RC	TB	XBH	TOB	TOBwe
1	Rick Ankiel	20-30	2000	2010	3	2	4.0	16	13	3	2	0	0	1	0.00	0	0	1	1	.385	.640	.538	1.178		.154	.556	7	7	2	16	16

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Starting & Relieving

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Starting & Relieving Table
					Starting Pitching			Relief Pitching
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	QS	QS%	GmScA	IR	IS	IS%	BSv	SV%	GF	GR
1	Rick Ankiel	19-24	1999	2004	18	44	53.1	3	1	33	0	100.0	1	10
2	Brian Stokes	26-30	2006	2010	1	20	47.8	87	36	41	6	14.3	52	168

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Starting & Relieving Table
					Starting Pitching			Relief Pitching
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	QS	QS%	GmScA	IR	IS	IS%	BSv	SV%	GF	GR
1	Rick Ankiel	20	2000	2000	0	0	35.5	0	0				0	1

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Ratios

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Ratios Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	K%	BB%	K-BB%
1	Rick Ankiel	19-33	1999	2013	51	41	242.0	25.9	12.5	13.4
2	Brian Stokes	26-30	2006	2010	173	5	206.2	14.5	10.1	4.3

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Ratios Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	K%	BB%	K-BB%
1	Rick Ankiel	20-30	2000	2010	3	2	4.0	19.2	42.3	-23.1

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Pitch Summary

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Pitch Summary Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	Pit	Pit/GS	Str	Str%
1	Rick Ankiel	19-33	1999	2013	51	41	242.0	3772	98	2256	59.81
2	Brian Stokes	26-30	2006	2010	173	5	206.2	3505	89	2142	61.11

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Pitch Summary Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	Pit	Pit/GS	Str	Str%
1	Rick Ankiel	20-30	2000	2010	3	2	4.0	116	50	54	46.55

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Batter vs. Pitcher

Rick Ankiel (Pitcher) vs. Brian Stokes (Batter): Year-by-Year Totals

Rick Ankiel (Pitcher) vs. Brian Stokes (Batter): Year-by-Year Totals Table
Rk	Year	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	SH	SF	IBB	HBP	GIDP
1	2009	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1.000	1.000	1.000	2.000	0	0	0	0	0
	Totals	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	1.000	1.000	1.000	2.000	0	0	0	0	0

Rick Ankiel (Pitcher) vs. Brian Stokes (Batter): Plate Appearances

Subscribe to Stathead Baseball for full results.

Go inside the Baseball Reference database and access the sports search engine that was made for fans like you. Subscriptions start at just $9/month. Learn More.

Get your first month FREE

Already a paid subscriber? Log in for full results.

Rick Ankiel (Pitcher) vs. Brian Stokes (Batter): Plate Appearances Table
Cr#	Year	Date	B Tm	P Tm		Inn	RoB	Out	Pit(cnt)	Play Description
1	2009	2009-04-21	STL	NYM	tied 4-4	b6	1--	0	1 (0-0)	Single to RF (Line Drive); B. Ryan to 2B

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Batting Comparison

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Batting Totals

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Batting Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	Rick Ankiel	19-33	1999	2013	651	2115	1921	260	462	101	10	76	251	21	12	162	555	.240	.302	.422	.724	92	811	31	12	8	12	13
2	Brian Stokes	26-30	2006	2010	96	4	3	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	.667	.667	.667	1.333	256	2	0	0	1	0	0

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Batting Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	Rick Ankiel	20-30	2000	2010	9	17	15	1	2	0	0	1	1	0	0	2	6	.133	.235	.333	.569	5	0	0	0	0	0

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Batting Value

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Batting Value Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	WAR	WAA	oWAR	dWAR	Rbat	Rdp	Rbaser	Rfield
1	Rick Ankiel	19-33	1999	2013	651	2115	5.5	-0.8	5.0	0.8	-23	1	-2	4
2	Brian Stokes	26-30	2006	2010	96	4	0.1	0.1	0.1	0.0	1	0	0	0

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Batting Sabermetric

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Batting Sabermetric Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	XBH	TOB	TOBwe	Outs	RC	BAbip	RP	BtRuns	BtWins	ISO	AB/SO	SB%	SBatt
1	Rick Ankiel	19-33	1999	2013	651	2115	187	636	654	1522	249	.296	435	-27	-2.8	.182	3.5	63.6	33
2	Brian Stokes	26-30	2006	2010	96	4	0	2	2	2	1	1.000	0	1	0.1	.000	3.0		0

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Batting Sabermetric Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	XBH	TOB	TOBwe	Outs	RC	BAbip	RP	BtRuns	BtWins	ISO	AB/SO	SB%	SBatt
1	Rick Ankiel	20-30	2000	2010	9	17	1	4	4	13	2	.125	1			.200	2.5		0

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Batting Win Probability

Rick Ankiel vs. Brian Stokes: Batting Win Probability Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	WPA	WPA/LI	Clutch	RE24	REW	RE24/boLI	aLI
1	Rick Ankiel	19-33	1999	2013	651	2115	-2.3	-1.0	-1.2	-20.99	-2.0	-9.71	1.05
2	Brian Stokes	26-30	2006	2010	96	4	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.05	0.0	0.09	0.14

Data coverage:

Game data: Game data is only available for the American League, National League, and Federal League. Since 1901 for regular season data, since 1933 for the All-Star Game, and since 1903 for the Postseason.

Season data: Since 1871. Stats relying on play-by-play data are complete back to 1969, nearly complete back to 1950, and mostly complete back to 1912. Postseason data since 1903.

Please see our data coverage page for details.

If you utilize material unique to a Sports Reference site for a tweet, an article, or for research for a broadcast or podcast, please strongly consider citing this site as the source for the material. It would be greatly appreciated and would help us continue to produce this material.