We're hiring a Senior DevOps Engineer! Come build with Sports Reference. Apply now.

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Head-to-Head Stats Comparison

Compare players and teams or see head to head results between teams, players, player vs. team, or batter vs. pitcher. • Tutorial Video • Sample Searches • Data Coverage

THIS QUESTION WAS ANSWERED USING

POWERED BY

Your All Access Pass to the Baseball Database Go beyond the basics. Become a Stathead

Start Your FREE Trial

Show Criteria

Compare Players

Head-to-head stats or multi-player comparisons

Compare Teams

Head-to-head results and comparisons

Player vs. Team

Head-to-head stats for a single player against a team

Today's Probables

Today's starting pitchers vs. opponents

Search Criteria

Seasons

All seasons

Choose season(s) for each choice

Choose same season(s) for all choices

Player 1

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: Dean Anna

Player 2

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: John Lackey

Player 3

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 4

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 5

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 6

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Team 1

Team 2

You have edited your search criteria

or keep editing your search

Fetching Results

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey

Regular Season: 2 PA , .000/.000/.000, 0 HR, 0 K

Playoffs: 0 PA

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Pitching Comparison

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Totals

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	W	L	W-L%	ERA	G	GS	GF	CG	SHO	SV	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	IBB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	BR	ERA+	FIP	WHIP	H9	HR9	BB9	SO9
1	Dean Anna	27-28	2014	2015	0	0		18.00	1	0	1	0	0	0	1.0	3	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6	3	30	3.13	3.000	27.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
2	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	188	147	.561	3.92	448	446	0	18	8	0	2840.1	2862	1347	1237	319	815	32	2294	133	12	125	12030	3913	110	3.94	1.295	9.1	1.0	2.6	7.3

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	W	L	W-L%	ERA	G	GS	GF	CG	SHO	SV	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	IBB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	BR	ERA+	FIP	WHIP	H9	HR9	BB9	SO9
1	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	8	6	.571	3.44	29	23	2	0	0	0	144.0	135	58	55	7	47	6	114	4	0	10	601	190		2.57	1.264	8.4	0.4	2.9	7.1

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Value

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Value Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	WAR	WAA
1	Dean Anna	27-28	2014	2015	1	0	1.0	-0.1	-0.2
2	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	448	446	2840.1	38.1	12.0

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Totals Against

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Totals Against Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	BR	AB	1B	2B	3B	SB	CS	SB%	PO	GIDP	SH	SF	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	ISO	BAbip	RC	TB	XBH	TOB	TOBwe
1	Dean Anna	27-28	2014	2015	1	0	1.0	3	6	2	1	0	0	0		0	0	0	0	.500	.500	.667	1.167	229	.167	.500	2	4	1	3	3
2	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	448	446	2840.1	3913	10935	1938	556	49	256	76	77.11	7	259	72	72	.262	.319	.409	.728	94	.147	.303	1437	4473	924	3810	3913

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Totals Against Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	BR	AB	1B	2B	3B	SB	CS	SB%	PO	GIDP	SH	SF	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	ISO	BAbip	RC	TB	XBH	TOB	TOBwe
1	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	29	23	144.0	190	540	100	26	2	6	3	66.67	0	16	3	5	.250	.312	.344	.657		.094	.302	61	186	35	186	190

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Starting & Relieving

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Starting & Relieving Table
					Starting Pitching			Relief Pitching
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	QS	QS%	GmScA	IR	IS	IS%	BSv	SV%	GF	GR
1	Dean Anna	27	2014	2014	0			0	0		0		1	1
2	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	267	60	52.5	0	0		0		0	2

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Starting & Relieving Table
					Starting Pitching			Relief Pitching
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	QS	QS%	GmScA	IR	IS	IS%	BSv	SV%	GF	GR
1	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	10	43	53.8	6	4	67	0		2	6

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Ratios

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Ratios Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	K%	BB%	K-BB%
1	Dean Anna	27-28	2014	2015	1	0	1.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
2	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	448	446	2840.1	19.1	6.8	12.3

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Ratios Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	K%	BB%	K-BB%
1	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	29	23	144.0	19.0	7.8	11.1

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Pitch Summary

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Pitch Summary Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	Pit	Pit/GS	Str	Str%
1	Dean Anna	27-28	2014	2015	1	0	1.0	17		14	82.35
2	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	448	446	2840.1	43915	101	28491	64.88

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Pitch Summary Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	Pit	Pit/GS	Str	Str%
1	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	29	23	144.0	2235	90	1415	63.31

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Batter vs. Pitcher

Dean Anna (Pitcher) vs. John Lackey (Batter): Year-by-Year Totals

Dean Anna (Pitcher) vs. John Lackey (Batter): Year-by-Year Totals Table
Rk	Year	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	SH	SF	IBB	HBP	GIDP
1	2014	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	.000	.000	.000	.000	0	0	0	0	0
	Totals	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	.000	.000	.000	.000	0	0	0	0	0

Dean Anna (Pitcher) vs. John Lackey (Batter): Plate Appearances

Subscribe to Stathead Baseball for full results.

Go inside the Baseball Reference database and access the sports search engine that was made for fans like you. Subscriptions start at just $9/month. Learn More.

Get your first month FREE

Already a subscriber? Log in for full results.

Dean Anna (Pitcher) vs. John Lackey (Batter): Plate Appearances Table
Cr#	Year	Date	B Tm	P Tm		Inn	RoB	Out	Pit(cnt)	Play Description
1	2014	2014-04-12	NYY	BOS	tied 2-2	b2	-2-	2	3 (1-1)	Popfly: SS (Deep 3B)
2	2014	2014-04-12	NYY	BOS	ahead 2-4	b4	---	2	2 (0-1)	Flyball: RF (CF-RF)

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Batting Comparison

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Batting Totals

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Batting Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	Dean Anna	27-28	2014	2015	13	26	23	3	3	1	0	1	3	0	0	2	6	.130	.192	.304	.497	38	7	0	0	0	1	0
2	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	121	265	236	6	26	7	0	0	8	1	1	9	97	.110	.143	.140	.283	-24	33	3	0	20	0	0

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Batting Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	29	13	12	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	5	.167	.231	.167	.397	2	0	1	0	0	0

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Batting Value

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Batting Value Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	WAR	WAA	oWAR	dWAR	Rbat	Rdp	Rbaser	Rfield
1	Dean Anna	27-28	2014	2015	13	26	0.2	0.1	0.0	0.3	-2	0	0	2
2	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	121	265	-0.8	-0.8	-0.8	0.0	-44	0	-1	0

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Batting Sabermetric

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Batting Sabermetric Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	XBH	TOB	TOBwe	Outs	RC	BAbip	RP	BtRuns	BtWins	ISO	AB/SO	SB%	SBatt
1	Dean Anna	27-28	2014	2015	13	26	2	5	5	21	2	.118	5	-2	-0.2	.174	3.8		0
2	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	121	265	7	35	35	234	7	.187	14	-45	-4.5	.030	2.4	50.00	2

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Batting Sabermetric Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	XBH	TOB	TOBwe	Outs	RC	BAbip	RP	BtRuns	BtWins	ISO	AB/SO	SB%	SBatt
1	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	29	13	0	3	3	10	1	.286	0			.000	2.4		0

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Batting Win Probability

Dean Anna vs. John Lackey: Batting Win Probability Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	WPA	WPA/LI	Clutch	RE24	REW	RE24/boLI	aLI
1	Dean Anna	27-28	2014	2015	13	26	0.1	-0.1	0.2	-1.29	-0.1	-2.16	0.88
2	John Lackey	23-38	2002	2017	121	265	-4.7	-4.1	-0.6	-46.88	-4.6	-45.95	1.00

Data coverage:

Game data: Game data is only available for the American League, National League, and Federal League. Since 1901 for regular season data, since 1933 for the All-Star Game, and since 1903 for the Postseason.

Season data: Since 1871. Stats relying on play-by-play data are complete back to 1969, nearly complete back to 1950, and mostly complete back to 1912. Postseason data since 1903.

Please see our data coverage page for details.

If you utilize material unique to a Sports Reference site for a tweet, an article, or for research for a broadcast or podcast, please strongly consider citing this site as the source for the material. It would be greatly appreciated and would help us continue to produce this material.