Stay up to date this MLB Season with the daily Baseball Reference Newsletter.

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Head-to-Head Stats Comparison

Compare players and teams or see head to head results between teams, players, player vs. team, or batter vs. pitcher. • Tutorial Video • Sample Searches • Data Coverage

THIS QUESTION WAS ANSWERED USING

POWERED BY

Your All Access Pass to the Baseball Database Go beyond the basics. Become a Stathead

Start Your FREE Trial

Show Criteria

Compare Players

Head-to-head stats or multi-player comparisons

Compare Teams

Head-to-head results and comparisons

Player vs. Team

Head-to-head stats for a single player against a team

Today's Probables

Today's starting pitchers vs. opponents

Search Criteria

Seasons

All seasons

Choose season(s) for each choice

Choose same season(s) for all choices

Player 1

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: Travis Jackson

Player 2

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: Erv Brame

Player 3

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 4

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 5

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 6

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Team 1

Team 2

You have edited your search criteria

or keep editing your search

Fetching Results

44.2

1656

6682

1768

135

929

71

.291

.337

.433

.770

102

WAR

G

PA

H

HR

RBI

SB

BA

OBP

SLG

OPS

OPS+

5.5

142

416

121

8

75

0

.306

.326

.429

.755

89

✓

2

1

Hall of Fame

Championships

All-Star

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Batting Comparison

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Totals

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	Erv Brame	26-30	1928	1932	218	416	396	43	121	21	2	8	75	0	0	10	32	.306	.326	.429	.755	89	170		2	8		0
2	Travis Jackson	18-32	1922	1936	1656	6682	6086	833	1768	291	86	135	929	71	70	412	565	.291	.337	.433	.770	102	2636	39	10	171		29

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	Travis Jackson	19-32	1923	1936	19	74	67	7	10	1	0	0	4	1	0	3	10	.149	.186	.164	.350	11	1	0	3		0

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Value

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Value Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	WAR	WAA	oWAR	dWAR	Rbat	Rdp	Rbaser	Rfield
1	Erv Brame	26-30	1928	1932	218	416	3.0	2.9	3.1	0.0	-7	-1	0	0
2	Travis Jackson	18-32	1922	1936	1656	6682	44.2	22.2	31.0	22.9	7	-2	-3	139

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Sabermetric

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Sabermetric Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	XBH	TOB	TOBwe	Outs	RC	BAbip	RP	BtRuns	BtWins	ISO	AB/SO	SB%	SBatt
1	Erv Brame	26-30	1928	1932	218	416	31	133	141	283	55	.317	110	-7	-0.8	.124	12.4		0
2	Travis Jackson	18-32	1922	1936	1656	6682	512	2190	2309	4598	878	.303	1627	3	0.1	.143	10.8	50.35	141

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Sabermetric Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	XBH	TOB	TOBwe	Outs	RC	BAbip	RP	BtRuns	BtWins	ISO	AB/SO	SB%	SBatt
1	Travis Jackson	19-32	1923	1936	19	74	1	13	13	61		.175	11			.015	6.7	100.00	1

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Win Probability

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Win Probability Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	WPA	WPA/LI	Clutch	RE24	REW	RE24/boLI	aLI
1	Erv Brame	26-30	1928	1932	218	416	-1.2	-0.6	-0.4	-0.38		-3.10	1.15
2	Travis Jackson	18-32	1922	1936	1656	6682	3.7	3.3	0.4	46.05		26.66	1.02

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Pitching Comparison

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Totals

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	W	L	W-L%	ERA	G	GS	GF	CG	SHO	SV	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	IBB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	BR	ERA+	FIP	WHIP	H9	HR9	BB9	SO9
1	Erv Brame	26-30	1928	1932	52	37	.584	4.76	142	91	34	62	3	0	791.2	946	492	419	62	232	3	188	6	1	9	3504	1240	94	4.36	1.488	10.8	0.7	2.6	2.1

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Value

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Value Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	WAR	WAA
1	Erv Brame	26-30	1928	1932	142	91	791.2	2.5	-3.9

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Totals Against

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Totals Against Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	BR	AB	1B	2B	3B	SB	CS	SB%	PO	GIDP	SH	SF	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	ISO	BAbip	RC	TB	XBH	TOB	TOBwe
1	Erv Brame	26-30	1928	1932	142	91	791.2	1240	3176	659	165	60	50	31	61.73	3	53	50	38	.298	.343	.446	.789	103	.148	.298	493	1417	287	1184	1240

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Starting & Relieving

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Starting & Relieving Table
					Starting Pitching			Relief Pitching
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	QS	QS%	GmScA	IR	IS	IS%	BSv	SV%	GF	GR
1	Erv Brame	26-30	1928	1932	41	45	45.9	39	16	41	1	0.0	34	51

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Ratios

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Ratios Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	K%	BB%	K-BB%
1	Erv Brame	26-30	1928	1932	142	91	791.2	5.4	6.6	-1.3
2	Travis Jackson	18-32	1922	1936

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Ratios Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	K%	BB%	K-BB%
1	Travis Jackson	19-32	1923	1936

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Pitch Summary

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Pitch Summary Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	Pit	Pit/GS	Str	Str%
1	Erv Brame	26-30	1928	1932	142	91	791.2

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Head-to-Head Batting

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Totals

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Totals Table
Rk	Player	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	Erv Brame	29	41	40	1	11	1	0	1	5	0	0	0	5	.275	.275	.375	.650	15		0	0		0
2	Travis Jackson	29	133	119	26	35	7	2	5	25	0	3	9	11	.294	.344	.513	.856	61		0	2		0

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Game Logs

Subscribe to Stathead Baseball for full results.

Go inside the Baseball Reference database and access the sports search engine that was made for fans like you. Subscriptions start at just $9/month. Learn More.

Get your first month FREE

Already a subscriber? Log in for full results.

Travis Jackson vs. Erv Brame: Game Logs Table
Rk	Player	Team	Date	GS	InnPl	BOP	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB	aLI	WPA	acLI	cWPA	RE24	DFS(DK)	DFS(FD)	Pos
1	Erv Brame	PIT	1931-08-13 (1)	*	9	9	4	4	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	.250	.250	.250	.500	1		0	0		0	0.63	-0.025	0.02	0.00%	-0.68			P
2	Travis Jackson	NYG	1931-08-13 (1)	*	9	6	4	4	0	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	.250	.250	.250	.500	1		0	0		0	1.32	-0.126	2.15	-0.12%	-0.74			SS
3	Erv Brame	PIT	1931-07-28	*	7	9	2	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	.500	.500	.500	1.000	1		0	0		0	0.92	0.008	0.08	0.00%	0.15			P
4	Travis Jackson	NYG	1931-07-28	*	9	6	5	5	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	.200	.200	.200	.400	1		0	0		0	1.28	-0.061	2.93	-0.08%	-0.66			SS
5	Erv Brame	PIT	1931-06-21		1	9	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	.000	.000	.000	.000	0		0	0		0	3.58	-0.138	0.90	-0.02%	-0.66			PH
6	Travis Jackson	NYG	1931-06-21	*	11	6	6	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	.000	.167	.000	.167	0		0	0		0	2.42	-0.355	11.41	-1.01%	-1.38			SS
7	Erv Brame	PIT	1931-06-20 (2)	*	8	9	2	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	.000	.000	.000	.000	0		0	0		0	1.30	-0.117	0.38	-0.02%	-0.88			P
8	Travis Jackson	NYG	1931-06-20 (2)	*	9	6	5	5	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	.000	.000	.000	.000	0		0	0		0	0.57	-0.066	2.44	-0.17%	-0.38			SS
9	Erv Brame	PIT	1931-06-13	*	9	9	4	4	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	.250	.250	.500	.750	2		0	0		0	1.40	-0.043	1.26	-0.02%	-0.41			P
10	Travis Jackson	NYG	1931-06-13	*	9	6	4	3	1	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	.333	.500	.333	.833	1		0	0		0	1.70	0.220	7.33	0.57%	0.68			SS
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Data coverage:

Game data: Game data is only available for the American League, National League, and Federal League. Since 1901 for regular season data, since 1933 for the All-Star Game, and since 1903 for the Postseason.

Season data: Since 1871. Stats relying on play-by-play data are complete back to 1969, nearly complete back to 1950, and mostly complete back to 1912. Postseason data since 1903.

Please see our data coverage page for details.

If you utilize material unique to a Sports Reference site for a tweet, an article, or for research for a broadcast or podcast, please strongly consider citing this site as the source for the material. It would be greatly appreciated and would help us continue to produce this material.