Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Head-to-Head Stats Comparison

Compare players and teams or see head to head results between teams, players, player vs. team, or batter vs. pitcher. • Tutorial Video • Sample Searches • Data Coverage

THIS QUESTION WAS ANSWERED USING

POWERED BY

Your All Access Pass to the Baseball Database Go beyond the basics. Become a Stathead

Start Your FREE Trial

Show Criteria

Compare Players

Head-to-head stats or multi-player comparisons

Compare Teams

Head-to-head results and comparisons

Player vs. Team

Head-to-head stats for a single player against a team

Today's Probables

Today's starting pitchers vs. opponents

Search Criteria

Seasons

All seasons

Choose season(s) for each choice

Choose same season(s) for all choices

Player 1

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: Elmer Miller

Player 2

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: George Cunningham

Player 3

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 4

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 5

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 6

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Team 1

Team 2

You have edited your search criteria

or keep editing your search

Fetching Results

George Cunningham

0.4

123

253

47

1

15

2

.224

.337

.295

.633

91

WAR

G

PA

H

HR

RBI

SB

BA

OBP

SLG

OPS

OPS+

-0.5

413

1605

343

16

154

31

.243

.307

.335

.642

80

Championships

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Batting Comparison

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Totals

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	George Cunningham	21-26	1916	1921	162	253	210	27	47	6	3	1	15	2	0	36	67	.224	.337	.295	.633	91	62		0	7
2	Elmer Miller	21-31	1912	1922	413	1605	1414	170	343	43	20	16	154	31	6	113	140	.243	.307	.335	.642	80	474		18	57

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	Elmer Miller	30	1921	1921	8	34	31	3	5	1	0	0	2	0	0	2	5	.161	.212	.194	.406	6		0	0		0

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Value

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Value Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	WAR	WAA	oWAR	dWAR	Rbat	Rdp	Rbaser	Rfield
1	George Cunningham	21-26	1916	1921	162	253	1.0	0.8	1.5	-0.6	-3	0	0	-4
2	Elmer Miller	21-31	1912	1922	413	1605	-0.5	-6.6	0.2	-2.2	-38	0	-2	-5

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Sabermetric

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Sabermetric Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	XBH	TOB	TOBwe	Outs	RC	BAbip	RP	BtRuns	BtWins	ISO	AB/SO	SB%	SBatt
1	George Cunningham	21-26	1916	1921	162	253	10	83	88	170	21	.324	41	-1	-0.1	.071	3.1		0
2	Elmer Miller	21-31	1912	1922	413	1605	79	474	512	1134	143	.260	308	-40	-4.4	.093	10.1	53.85	13

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Sabermetric Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	XBH	TOB	TOBwe	Outs	RC	BAbip	RP	BtRuns	BtWins	ISO	AB/SO	SB%	SBatt
1	Elmer Miller	30	1921	1921	8	34	1	7	7	26		.192	5			.032	6.2		0

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Win Probability

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Win Probability Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	WPA	WPA/LI	Clutch	RE24	REW	RE24/boLI	aLI
1	George Cunningham	21-26	1916	1921	162	253	-0.1	-0.1	-0.1	-3.57		-1.50	1.00
2	Elmer Miller	21-31	1912	1922	413	1605	-4.4	-2.0	-2.1	-19.04		-23.54	1.07

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Pitching Comparison

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Totals

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	W	L	W-L%	ERA	G	GS	GF	CG	SHO	SV	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	IBB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	BR	ERA+	FIP	WHIP	H9	HR9	BB9	SO9
1	George Cunningham	21-26	1916	1921	16	25	.390	3.13	123	36	66	19	0	8	477.0	444	247	166	2	178		167	17	0	15	1955	690	88	2.87	1.304	8.4	0.0	3.4	3.2

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Value

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Value Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	WAR	WAA
1	George Cunningham	21-26	1916	1921	123	36	477.0	-0.6	-5.1

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Totals Against

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Totals Against Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	BR	AB	1B	2B	3B	SB	CS	SB%	PO	GIDP	SH	SF	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	ISO	BAbip	RC	TB	XBH	TOB	TOBwe
1	George Cunningham	21-26	1916	1921	123	36	477.0	690	1743	356	53	33	50	20	71.43	3	13	70	20	.255	.326	.326	.653	98	.072	.277	188	569	88	639	690

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Starting & Relieving

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Starting & Relieving Table
					Starting Pitching			Relief Pitching
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	QS	QS%	GmScA	IR	IS	IS%	BSv	SV%	GF	GR
1	George Cunningham	21-24	1916	1919	21	58	49.5	30	8	27	0	100.0	66	87

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Ratios

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Ratios Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	K%	BB%	K-BB%
1	George Cunningham	21-26	1916	1921	123	36	477.0	8.5	9.1	-0.6
2	Elmer Miller	21-31	1912	1922

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Ratios Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	K%	BB%	K-BB%
1	Elmer Miller	30	1921	1921

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Pitch Summary

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Pitch Summary Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	Pit	Pit/GS	Str	Str%
1	George Cunningham	21-26	1916	1921	123	36	477.0

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Head-to-Head Batting

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Totals

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Totals Table
Rk	Player	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	George Cunningham	9	10	9	2	3	0	0	0	1	0		1	2	.333	.400	.333	.733	3		0	0		0
2	Elmer Miller	9	33	28	3	7	2	0	0	4	0		1	1	.250	.300	.321	.621	9		1	3		0

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Game Logs

Subscribe to Stathead Baseball for full results.

Go inside the Baseball Reference database and access the sports search engine that was made for fans like you. Subscriptions start at just $9/month. Learn More.

Get your first month FREE

Already a subscriber? Log in for full results.

Elmer Miller vs. George Cunningham: Game Logs Table
Rk	Player	Team	Date	GS	InnPl	BOP	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB	aLI	WPA	acLI	cWPA	RE24	DFS(DK)	DFS(FD)	Pos
1	George Cunningham	DET	1918-07-18 (1)		5	3	2	2	1	1	0	0	0	0	0		0	0	.500	.500	.500	1.000	1		0	0		0	0.64	0.036	0.04	0.00%	0.04			RF
2	Elmer Miller	NYY	1918-07-18 (1)		1	9	1	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0		0	0	.000	.000	.000	.000	0		0	0		0	0.39	-0.010	0.94	-0.01%	-0.13			PH
3	George Cunningham	DET	1918-07-16 (2)		8	5	3	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0		0	1	.000	.000	.000	.000	0		0	0		0	1.04	-0.074	0.06	0.00%	-0.59			RF
4	Elmer Miller	NYY	1918-07-16 (2)	*	9	7	3	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0		0	0	.000	.000	.000	.000	0		0	0		0	1.38	-0.103	4.67	-0.21%	-0.68			CF
5	George Cunningham	DET	1917-09-25		1	9	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0		0	0					0		0	0										P
6	Elmer Miller	NYY	1917-09-25	*	9	1	5	5	0	3	0	0	0	2	0		0	0	.600	.600	.600	1.200	3		0	0		0	1.50	0.147	0.00	0.00%	1.75			CF
7	George Cunningham	DET	1917-08-07	*	9	9	3	3	0	1	0	0	0	1	0		0	1	.333	.333	.333	.667	1		0	0		0	1.57	0.103	0.49	0.02%	0.69			P
8	Elmer Miller	NYY	1917-08-07	*	9	7	3	3	0	0	0	0	0	1	0		0	0	.000	.000	.000	.000	0		0	0		0	1.32	-0.012	0.21	0.00%	-0.27			LF
9	George Cunningham	DET	1917-08-06		2	9	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0		0	0					0		0	0										P
10	Elmer Miller	NYY	1917-08-06	*	9	7	4	2	1	1	1	0	0	0	0		1	0	.500	.667	1.000	1.667	2		0	1		0	0.97	-0.012	0.13	0.00%	0.20			LF
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Data coverage:

Game data: Game data is only available for the American League, National League, and Federal League. Since 1901 for regular season data, since 1933 for the All-Star Game, and since 1903 for the Postseason.

Season data: Since 1871. Stats relying on play-by-play data are complete back to 1969, nearly complete back to 1950, and mostly complete back to 1912. Postseason data since 1903.

Please see our data coverage page for details.

If you utilize material unique to a Sports Reference site for a tweet, an article, or for research for a broadcast or podcast, please strongly consider citing this site as the source for the material. It would be greatly appreciated and would help us continue to produce this material.