Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Head-to-Head Stats Comparison

Compare players and teams or see head to head results between teams, players, player vs. team, or batter vs. pitcher. • Tutorial Video • Sample Searches • Data Coverage

THIS QUESTION WAS ANSWERED USING

POWERED BY

Your All Access Pass to the Baseball Database Go beyond the basics. Become a Stathead

Start Your FREE Trial

Show Criteria

Compare Players

Head-to-head stats or multi-player comparisons

Compare Teams

Head-to-head results and comparisons

Player vs. Team

Head-to-head stats for a single player against a team

Today's Probables

Today's starting pitchers vs. opponents

Search Criteria

Seasons

All seasons

Choose season(s) for each choice

Choose same season(s) for all choices

Player 1

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: Randy Johnson

Player 2

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: Tom Seaver

Player 3

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 4

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 5

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 6

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Team 1

Team 2

You have edited your search criteria

or keep editing your search

Fetching Results

109.9

656

647

4783.0

311-205

1

2.86

127

3640

18.8

1390

7.2

WAR

G

GS

IP

W-L

SV

ERA

ERA+

SO

K%

BB

BB%

101.1

618

603

4135.1

303-166

2

3.29

135

4875

28.6

1497

8.8

✓

1

12

3

3

Hall of Fame

Championships

All-Star

Cy Young

ERA Title

WS MVP

Triple Crown

✓

1

10

5

4

1

1

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Pitching Comparison

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Totals

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	W	L	W-L%	ERA	G	GS	GF	CG	SHO	SV	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	IBB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	BR	ERA+	FIP	WHIP	H9	HR9	BB9	SO9
1	Randy Johnson	24-45	1988	2009	303	166	.646	3.29	618	603	7	100	37	2	4135.1	3346	1703	1513	411	1497	37	4875	190	33	109	17067	5220	135	3.19	1.171	7.3	0.9	3.3	10.6
2	Tom Seaver	22-41	1967	1986	311	205	.603	2.86	656	647	6	231	61	1	4783.0	3971	1674	1521	380	1390	116	3640	76	8	126	19369	5649	127	3.04	1.121	7.5	0.7	2.6	6.8

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	W	L	W-L%	ERA	G	GS	GF	CG	SHO	SV	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	IBB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	BR	ERA+	FIP	WHIP	H9	HR9	BB9	SO9
1	Randy Johnson	31-42	1995	2006	7	9	.438	3.50	19	16	2	3	2	0	121.0	106	51	47	15	32	2	132	0	0	0	493	144		3.11	1.140	7.9	1.1	2.4	9.8
2	Tom Seaver	24-34	1969	1979	3	3	.500	2.77	8	8	0	2	0	0	61.2	51	20	19	6	16	4	51	2	0	2	255	73		2.19	1.086	7.4	0.9	2.3	7.4

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Value

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Value Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	WAR	WAA
1	Randy Johnson	24-45	1988	2009	618	603	4135.1	103.5	67.4
2	Tom Seaver	22-41	1967	1986	656	647	4783.0	106.0	65.2

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Totals Against

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Totals Against Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	BR	AB	1B	2B	3B	SB	CS	SB%	PO	GIDP	SH	SF	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	ISO	BAbip	RC	TB	XBH	TOB	TOBwe
1	Randy Johnson	24-45	1988	2009	618	603	4135.1	5220	15159	2217	660	58	457	224	67.11	58	251	131	89	.221	.297	.353	.650	71	.133	.295	1604	5355	1129	5033	5220
2	Tom Seaver	22-41	1967	1986	656	647	4783.0	5649	17604	2796	675	120	409	164	71.38	14	316	187	111	.226	.283	.342	.626	79	.117	.262	1729	6026	1175	5437	5649

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Totals Against Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	BR	AB	1B	2B	3B	SB	CS	SB%	PO	GIDP	SH	SF	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	ISO	BAbip	RC	TB	XBH	TOB	TOBwe
1	Randy Johnson	31-42	1995	2006	19	16	121.0	144	451	73	15	3	9	6	60.00	1	6	5	5	.235	.283	.381	.664		.146	.295	53	172	33	138	144
2	Tom Seaver	24-34	1969	1979	8	8	61.2	73	231	29	15	1	3	1	75.00	0	1	2	4	.221	.273	.372	.645		.152	.253	25	86	22	69	73

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Starting & Relieving

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Starting & Relieving Table
					Starting Pitching			Relief Pitching
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	QS	QS%	GmScA	IR	IS	IS%	BSv	SV%	GF	GR
1	Randy Johnson	24-45	1988	2009	403	67	59.9	7	4	57	2	50.0	7	15
2	Tom Seaver	22-41	1967	1986	454	70	60.3	9	1	11	1	50.0	6	9

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Starting & Relieving Table
					Starting Pitching			Relief Pitching
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	QS	QS%	GmScA	IR	IS	IS%	BSv	SV%	GF	GR
1	Randy Johnson	31-42	1995	2006	11	69	58.2	5	0	0	0		2	3
2	Tom Seaver	24-34	1969	1979	6	75	62.3						0	0

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Ratios

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Ratios Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	K%	BB%	K-BB%
1	Randy Johnson	24-45	1988	2009	618	603	4135.1	28.6	8.8	19.8
2	Tom Seaver	22-41	1967	1986	656	647	4783.0	18.8	7.2	11.6

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Ratios Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	K%	BB%	K-BB%
1	Randy Johnson	31-42	1995	2006	19	16	121.0	26.8	6.5	20.3
2	Tom Seaver	24-34	1969	1979	8	8	61.2	20.0	6.3	13.7

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Pitch Summary

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Pitch Summary Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	Pit	Pit/GS	Str	Str%
1	Randy Johnson	24-45	1988	2009	618	603	4135.1	29515	111	19541	66.21
2	Tom Seaver	22-41	1967	1986	656	647	4783.0		104

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Pitch Summary Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	Pit	Pit/GS	Str	Str%
1	Randy Johnson	31-42	1995	2006	19	16	121.0	1686	104	1128	66.90
2	Tom Seaver	24-34	1969	1979	8	8	61.2	100	100	64	64.00

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Batting Comparison

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Batting Totals

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Batting Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	Randy Johnson	24-45	1988	2009	273	691	625	20	78	14	0	1	40	0	0	19	296	.125	.153	.152	.305	-22	95	10	2	44	1	0
2	Tom Seaver	22-41	1967	1986	582	1552	1315	99	202	28	5	12	86	4	0	108	485	.154	.219	.210	.429	22	276	22	4	121	4	0

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Batting Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	Randy Johnson	31-42	1995	2006	19	24	24	2	2	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	13	.083	.083	.125	.208	3	0	0	0	0	0
2	Tom Seaver	24-34	1969	1979	8	21	20	1	2	2	0	0	1	0	0	1	6	.100	.143	.200	.343	4	1	0	0	0	0

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Batting Value

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Batting Value Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	WAR	WAA	oWAR	dWAR	Rbat	Rdp	Rbaser	Rfield
1	Randy Johnson	24-45	1988	2009	273	691	-2.5	-2.5	-2.4	0.0	-118	-1	-3	0
2	Tom Seaver	22-41	1967	1986	582	1552	3.9	3.7	3.6	0.3	-135	0	-3	0

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Batting Sabermetric

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Batting Sabermetric Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	XBH	TOB	TOBwe	Outs	RC	BAbip	RP	BtRuns	BtWins	ISO	AB/SO	SB%	SBatt
1	Randy Johnson	24-45	1988	2009	273	691	15	99	106	602	14	.234	59	-117	-11.4	.027	2.1		0
2	Tom Seaver	22-41	1967	1986	582	1552	45	314	333	1260	69	.231	173	-140	-14.9	.056	2.7	100.0	4

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Batting Sabermetric Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	XBH	TOB	TOBwe	Outs	RC	BAbip	RP	BtRuns	BtWins	ISO	AB/SO	SB%	SBatt
1	Randy Johnson	31-42	1995	2006	19	24	1	2	2	22	1	.182	3			.042	1.8		0
2	Tom Seaver	24-34	1969	1979	8	21	2	3	3	19	2	.143	2			.100	3.3		0

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Batting Win Probability

Randy Johnson vs. Tom Seaver: Batting Win Probability Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	WPA	WPA/LI	Clutch	RE24	REW	RE24/boLI	aLI
1	Randy Johnson	24-45	1988	2009	273	691	-10.1	-10.7	-0.2	-116.75	-10.9	-125.14	0.92
2	Tom Seaver	22-41	1967	1986	582	1552	-11.9	-12.8	0.1	-136.53	-14.3	-136.40	0.94

Data coverage:

Game data: Game data is only available for the American League, National League, and Federal League. Since 1901 for regular season data, since 1933 for the All-Star Game, and since 1903 for the Postseason.

Season data: Since 1871. Stats relying on play-by-play data are complete back to 1969, nearly complete back to 1950, and mostly complete back to 1912. Postseason data since 1903.

Please see our data coverage page for details.

If you utilize material unique to a Sports Reference site for a tweet, an article, or for research for a broadcast or podcast, please strongly consider citing this site as the source for the material. It would be greatly appreciated and would help us continue to produce this material.