Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Head-to-Head Stats Comparison

Compare players and teams or see head to head results between teams, players, player vs. team, or batter vs. pitcher. • Tutorial Video • Sample Searches • Data Coverage

THIS QUESTION WAS ANSWERED USING

POWERED BY

Your All Access Pass to the Baseball Database Go beyond the basics. Become a Stathead

Start Your FREE Trial

Show Criteria

Compare Players

Head-to-head stats or multi-player comparisons

Compare Teams

Head-to-head results and comparisons

Player vs. Team

Head-to-head stats for a single player against a team

Today's Probables

Today's starting pitchers vs. opponents

Search Criteria

Seasons

All seasons

Choose season(s) for each choice

Choose same season(s) for all choices

Player 1

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: Ty Cobb

Player 2

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: Stan Musial

Player 3

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 4

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 5

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 6

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Team 1

Team 2

You have edited your search criteria

or keep editing your search

Fetching Results

151.5

3034

13103

4189

117

1944

897

.366

.433

.512

.944

168

WAR

G

PA

H

HR

RBI

SB

BA

OBP

SLG

OPS

OPS+

128.5

3026

12721

3630

475

1951

78

.331

.417

.559

.976

159

✓

1

12

1

Hall of Fame

Championships

All-Star

MVP

Batting Titl

Triple Crown

✓

3

24

3

7

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Batting Comparison

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Totals

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	Ty Cobb	18-41	1905	1928	3034	13103	11440	2245	4189	724	295	117	1944	897	215	1249	680	.366	.433	.512	.944	168	5854		94	292		9
2	Stan Musial	20-42	1941	1963	3026	12721	10972	1949	3630	725	177	475	1951	78	71	1599	696	.331	.417	.559	.976	159	6134	243	53	35	53	298

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	AB	R	H	2B	3B	HR	RBI	SB	CS	BB	SO	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	TB	GIDP	HBP	SH	SF	IBB
1	Ty Cobb	20-22	1907	1909	17	71	65	7	17	4	1	0	9	4		3	7	.262	.314	.354	.668	23		2	1		0
2	Stan Musial	21-25	1942	1946	23	99	86	9	22	7	1	1	8	1	1	12	4	.256	.347	.395	.742	34	1	0	1		2

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Value

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Value Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	WAR	WAA	oWAR	dWAR	Rbat	Rdp	Rbaser	Rfield
1	Ty Cobb	18-41	1905	1928	3034	13103	151.4	101.9	151.7	-10.8	995	0	55	0
2	Stan Musial	20-42	1941	1963	3026	12721	128.5	81.7	125.1	-9.2	868	18	8	50

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Sabermetric

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Sabermetric Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	XBH	TOB	TOBwe	Outs	RC	BAbip	RP	BtRuns	BtWins	ISO	AB/SO	SB%	SBatt
1	Ty Cobb	18-41	1905	1928	3034	13103	1136	5532	5688	7758	2513	.383	4072	1040	110.3	.146	16.8	64.3	603
2	Stan Musial	20-42	1941	1963	3026	12721	1377	5282	5415	7744	2552	.320	3425	960	94.3	.228	15.8	52.3	149

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Sabermetric Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	XBH	TOB	TOBwe	Outs	RC	BAbip	RP	BtRuns	BtWins	ISO	AB/SO	SB%	SBatt
1	Ty Cobb	20-22	1907	1909	17	71	5	22	23	49	7	.293	16			.092	9.3
2	Stan Musial	21-25	1942	1946	23	99	9	34	35	67	12	.259	16			.140	21.5	50.0	2

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Win Probability

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Win Probability Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	PA	WPA	WPA/LI	Clutch	RE24	REW	RE24/boLI	aLI
1	Ty Cobb	18-41	1905	1928	3034	13103	67.4	56.3	7.9	695.55	70.6	626.99	1.05
2	Stan Musial	20-42	1941	1963	3026	12721	86.3	87.4	-3.0	942.85	91.2	976.81	1.02

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Pitching Comparison

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Totals

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	W	L	W-L%	ERA	G	GS	GF	CG	SHO	SV	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	IBB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	BR	ERA+	FIP	WHIP	H9	HR9	BB9	SO9
1	Ty Cobb	18-41	1905	1928	0	0		3.60	3	0	2	0	0	1	5.0	6	2	2	0	2		0	0	0	0	20	8	99	3.42	1.600	10.8	0.0	3.6	0.0
2	Stan Musial	20-42	1941	1963	0	0			1	0	0	0	0	0	0.0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1	1

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Value

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Value Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	WAR	WAA
1	Ty Cobb	18-41	1905	1928	3	0	5.0	0.1	0.0
2	Stan Musial	20-42	1941	1963	1	0	0.0	0.0	0.0

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Totals Against

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Totals Against Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	BR	AB	1B	2B	3B	SB	CS	SB%	PO	GIDP	SH	SF	BA	OBP	SLG	OPS	OPS+	ISO	BAbip	RC	TB	XBH	TOB	TOBwe
1	Ty Cobb	18-41	1905	1928	3	0	5.0	8	18	5	1	0						0	0	.333	.400	.389	.789	142	.056	.333	3	7	1	8	8
2	Stan Musial	20-42	1941	1963	1	0	0.0	1	1	0	0	0	0	0		0	0	0	0	.000	.000	.000	.000	-100	.000	.000	0	0	0	0	1

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Starting & Relieving

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Starting & Relieving Table
					Starting Pitching			Relief Pitching
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	QS	QS%	GmScA	IR	IS	IS%	BSv	SV%	GF	GR
1	Ty Cobb	31-38	1918	1925	0							100.0	2	3
2	Stan Musial	31	1952	1952	0			1	0	0	0		0	1

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Ratios

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Ratios Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	K%	BB%	K-BB%
1	Ty Cobb	18-41	1905	1928	3	0	5.0	0.0	10.0	-10.0
2	Stan Musial	20-42	1941	1963	1	0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Pitch Summary

Ty Cobb vs. Stan Musial: Pitch Summary Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	IP	Pit	Pit/GS	Str	Str%
1	Ty Cobb	18-41	1905	1928	3	0	5.0
2	Stan Musial	20-42	1941	1963	1	0	0.0

Data coverage:

Game data: Game data is only available for the American League, National League, and Federal League. Since 1901 for regular season data, since 1933 for the All-Star Game, and since 1903 for the Postseason.

Season data: Since 1871. Stats relying on play-by-play data are complete back to 1969, nearly complete back to 1950, and mostly complete back to 1912. Postseason data since 1903.

Please see our data coverage page for details.

If you utilize material unique to a Sports Reference site for a tweet, an article, or for research for a broadcast or podcast, please strongly consider citing this site as the source for the material. It would be greatly appreciated and would help us continue to produce this material.