Binge play every Immaculate Grid game with the archive mode and put your basketball knowledge to the test.

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Head-to-Head Stats Comparison

Compare players and teams or see head to head results between teams, players, or player vs. team. • Sample Searches • Data Coverage

THIS QUESTION WAS ANSWERED USING

POWERED BY

Your All Access Pass to the Basketball Database Go beyond the basics. Become a Stathead

Start Your FREE Trial

Show Criteria

Compare Players
Head-to-head stats or multi-player comparisons

Compare Teams
Head-to-head results and comparisons

Player vs. Team
Head-to-head stats for a single player against a team

Search Criteria

Click on the red text to pre-fill the form with various values

Seasons

All seasons

Choose season(s) for each choice

Choose same season(s) for all choices

Player 1

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: Lauren Jackson

Player 2

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Choice is: Candace Parker

Player 3

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 4

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 5

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Player 6

Javascript is required for the selection of a player.

Type name to select an option

Team 1

Team 2

You have edited your search criteria

or keep editing your search

Fetching Results

6-4

Reg Season

4-6

317

18.9

7.7

1.4

1.1

1.8

.460

.351

.842

.508

G

PTS/G

TRB/G

AST/G

STL/G

BLK/G

FG%

3P%

FT%

eFG%

410

16.0

8.5

4.0

1.3

1.5

.479

.333

.767

.512

✓

2

7

8

5

3

1

1

7

Hall of Fame

Championships

1st Tm All-WNBA

All-WNBA

All-Def

MVP

DPOY

Finals MVP

All-Star

3

7

10

2

2

1

1

7

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Head-to-Head Stats

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Per Game

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Per Game Table
Rk	Player	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	2P	2PA	3P	3PA	FT	FTA	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
1	Candace Parker	10	10	35.6	6.3	13.0	5.8	11.3	0.5	1.7	3.6	4.4	2.0	7.4	9.4	2.8	1.0	2.2	3.7	2.4	16.7
2	Lauren Jackson	10	10	31.2	5.0	14.3	4.1	9.7	0.9	4.6	4.8	5.4	1.5	4.5	6.0	0.7	1.4	1.7	1.3	3.3	15.7

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Totals

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Totals Table
Rk	Player	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	eFG%	FT	FTA	FT%	TS%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
1	Candace Parker	10	10	356	63	130	.485	58	113	.513	5	17	.294	.504	36	44	.818	.559	20	74	94	28	10	22	37	24	167
2	Lauren Jackson	10	10	312	50	143	.350	41	97	.423	9	46	.196	.381	48	54	.889	.471	15	45	60	7	14	17	13	33	157

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Game Logs

Subscribe to Stathead Basketball for full results.

Go inside the Basketball Reference database and access the sports search engine that was made for fans like you. Subscriptions start at just $8/month. Learn More.

Get your first month FREE

Already a subscriber? Log in for full results.

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Game Logs Table
Rk	Player	Team	Date	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	TS%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS	GmSc	BPM	+/-
1	Lauren Jackson	SEA	2011-08-30	*	27	3	13	.231	2	7	.286	1	6	.167	7	8	.875	.424	2	4	6	1	2	0	2	3	14	7.8
2	Candace Parker	LAS	2011-08-30	*	38	8	16	.500	5	11	.455	3	5	.600	8	9	.889	.676	0	7	7	3	0	1	3	4	27	18.9
3	Lauren Jackson	SEA	2011-08-28	*	27	5	13	.385	5	11	.455	0	2	.000	4	6	.667	.448	0	5	5	0	0	2	0	1	14	8.6
4	Candace Parker	LAS	2011-08-28	*	34	7	13	.538	7	11	.636	0	2	.000	5	5	1.000	.625	2	12	14	2	2	5	3	3	19	20.4
5	Lauren Jackson	SEA	2011-06-19	*	27	3	14	.214	2	8	.250	1	6	.167	2	2	1.000	.302	1	3	4	0	3	1	0	0	9	5.7
6	Candace Parker	LAS	2011-06-19	*	26	5	8	.625	5	7	.714	0	1	.000	0	0		.625	1	6	7	3	0	0	2	2	10	8.2
7	Lauren Jackson	SEA	2010-06-11	*	32	6	17	.353	6	11	.545	0	6	.000	5	5	1.000	.443	4	5	9	1	1	1	4	3	17	9.0
8	Candace Parker	LAS	2010-06-11	*	31	6	12	.500	5	10	.500	1	2	.500	0	2	.000	.505	2	5	7	2	0	2	5	1	13	6.5
9	Lauren Jackson	SEA	2010-06-05	*	29	6	13	.462	5	11	.455	1	2	.500	4	4	1.000	.576	1	8	9	1	0	1	1	4	17	12.2
10	Candace Parker	LAS	2010-06-05	*	36	8	14	.571	8	13	.615	0	1	.000	8	9	.889	.668	1	7	8	4	1	0	5	1	24	18.2
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Player Comparison

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Per Game

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Per Game Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	eFG%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
1	Lauren Jackson	20-31	2001	2012	317	317	32.0	6.6	14.3	.460	5.2	10.4	.501	1.4	3.9	.351	.508	4.4	5.2	.842	2.2	5.5	7.7	1.4	1.1	1.8	1.7	3.1	18.9
2	Candace Parker	22-37	2008	2023	410	406	30.4	6.0	12.6	.479	5.2	10.1	.515	0.8	2.5	.333	.512	3.1	4.1	.767	1.5	6.9	8.5	4.0	1.3	1.5	2.6	2.0	16.0

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Per Game Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	eFG%	FT	FTA	FT%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
1	Lauren Jackson	21-31	2002	2012	31	31	33.6	5.7	12.9	.442	4.3	9.1	.470	1.4	3.8	.376	.497	4.6	5.5	.841	1.9	5.9	7.8	1.0	1.1	1.5	1.8	2.9	17.5
2	Candace Parker	22-36	2008	2022	66	66	33.3	6.4	13.4	.481	5.5	10.1	.538	1.0	3.2	.304	.518	3.5	4.6	.777	1.9	7.3	9.2	3.8	1.6	1.8	2.5	2.5	17.4

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Totals

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	eFG%	FT	FTA	FT%	TS%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
1	Lauren Jackson	20-31	2001	2012	317	317	10130	2089	4543	.460	1653	3300	.501	436	1243	.351	.508	1391	1653	.842	.570	707	1737	2444	435	360	586	549	982	6005
2	Candace Parker	22-37	2008	2023	410	406	12445	2471	5163	.479	2129	4136	.515	342	1027	.333	.512	1290	1682	.767	.557	621	2846	3467	1634	523	619	1062	834	6574

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Totals Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	MP	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	eFG%	FT	FTA	FT%	TS%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
1	Lauren Jackson	21-31	2002	2012	31	31	1042	177	400	.443	133	283	.470	44	117	.376	.498	143	170	.841	.570	58	184	242	30	35	47	56	90	541
2	Candace Parker	22-36	2008	2022	66	66	2196	425	883	.481	360	669	.538	65	214	.304	.518	234	301	.777	.566	125	485	610	251	108	117	164	164	1149

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Per 36 Minutes

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Per 36 Minutes Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	TS%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
1	Lauren Jackson	20-31	2001	2012	7.4	16.1	.460	5.9	11.7	.501	1.5	4.4	.351	4.9	5.9	.842	.6	2.5	6.2	8.7	1.5	1.3	2.1	2.0	3.5	21.3
2	Candace Parker	22-37	2008	2023	7.1	14.9	.479	6.2	12.0	.515	1.0	3.0	.333	3.7	4.9	.767	.6	1.8	8.2	10.0	4.7	1.5	1.8	3.1	2.4	19.0

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Per 36 Minutes Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	TS%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS
1	Lauren Jackson	21-31	2002	2012	6.1	13.8	.442	4.6	9.8	.470	1.5	4.0	.376	4.9	5.9	.841	.6	2.0	6.4	8.4	1.0	1.2	1.6	1.9	3.1	18.7
2	Candace Parker	22-36	2008	2022	7.0	14.5	.481	5.9	11.0	.538	1.1	3.5	.304	3.8	4.9	.777	.6	2.0	8.0	10.0	4.1	1.8	1.9	2.7	2.7	18.8

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Per 100 Possessions

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Per 100 Possessions Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	TS%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS	ORtg	DRtg
1	Lauren Jackson	20-31	2001	2012	11.5	25.0	.460	9.1	18.1	.501	2.4	6.8	.351	7.7	9.1	.842	.6	3.9	9.6	13.4	2.4	2.0	3.2	3.0	5.4	33.0	116	93
2	Candace Parker	22-37	2008	2023	10.3	21.5	.479	8.9	17.2	.515	1.4	4.3	.333	5.4	7.0	.767	.6	2.6	11.8	14.4	6.8	2.2	2.6	4.4	3.5	27.4	107	94

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Per 100 Possessions Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	FG	FGA	FG%	2P	2PA	2P%	3P	3PA	3P%	FT	FTA	FT%	TS%	ORB	DRB	TRB	AST	STL	BLK	TOV	PF	PTS	ORtg	DRtg
1	Lauren Jackson	21-31	2002	2012	9.2	20.9	.442	6.9	14.8	.470	2.3	6.1	.376	7.5	8.9	.841	.6	3.0	9.6	12.6	1.6	1.8	2.5	2.9	4.7	28.2	113	96
2	Candace Parker	22-36	2008	2022	10.1	21.0	.481	8.6	15.9	.538	1.5	5.1	.304	5.6	7.2	.777	.6	3.0	11.5	14.5	6.0	2.6	2.8	3.9	3.9	27.3	111	95

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Advanced

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Advanced Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	MP	PER	TS%	ORB%	TRB%	AST%	STL%	BLK%	TOV%	USG%	OWS	DWS	WS	WS/48	OBPM	DBPM	BPM	VORP
1	Lauren Jackson	20-31	2001	2012	317	317	10130	27.9	.570	9.0	15.4	9.7	2.0	4.9	9.4	27.3	52.3	20.7	73.0	.346
2	Candace Parker	22-37	2008	2023	410	406	12445	24.4	.557	6.2	16.7	23.5	2.2	4.0	15.2	25.5	34.0	30.3	64.3	.248

Lauren Jackson vs. Candace Parker: Advanced Table
Rk	Player	Age	From	To	G	GS	MP	PER	TS%	ORB%	TRB%	AST%	STL%	BLK%	TOV%	USG%	OWS	DWS	WS	WS/48	OBPM	DBPM	BPM	VORP
1	Lauren Jackson	21-31	2002	2012	31	31	1042	22.3	.570	7.2	14.7	6.1	1.8	3.7	10.6	23.9	3.5	2.3	5.8	.266
2	Candace Parker	22-36	2008	2022	66	66	2196	24.2	.566	6.9	16.6	20.7	2.6	4.2	13.9	24.4	6.0	5.8	11.8	.257

Data coverage:

Game data: since 1946-47 unless otherwise noted. Regular season: PTS, FG, FT, 3P complete all-time. FTA complete back to 1948-49. FGA, TRB, AST, PF, GS over 99% complete back to 1975-76. MP over 99% complete back to 1976-77. +/- complete back to 1996-97. All other box score stats (3PA, ORB, DRB, STL, BLK, TOV) complete back to 1983-84. Playoffs: PTS, FG, FT, FTA, 3P, 3PA complete all-time. PF complete back to 1948-49. FGA, TRB, AST complete back to 1962-63. GS complete back to 1973-74. MP complete back to 1974-75. +/- complete back to 1996-97. STL, BLK, TOV complete back to 1982-83. ORB, DRB complete back to 1983-84. BPM not available for WNBA & ABA.

Season data: since 1946-47 unless otherwise noted. All box score stats are covered all-time (though not all stats were tracked for all of NBA history). PER since 1951-52. AST% since 1964-65. TRB% since 1970-71. BPM, VORP, DRtg and Per 100 Poss stats since 1973-74. ORtg since 1977-78. GS since 1981-82. Some stats were available earlier in the ABA. WNBA all-time (since 1997) unless otherwise noted. BPM and VORP not available for WNBA.

Please see our data coverage page for details.

If you utilize material unique to a Sports Reference site for a tweet, an article, or for research for a broadcast or podcast, please strongly consider citing this site as the source for the material. It would be greatly appreciated and would help us continue to produce this material.